Supplier media is temporarily unavailable. Review the stone details and report below, or ask us about this stone.
Video served by supplier · Open in new tab ↗
VY-45209099
F · VS2 · Ideal
This price is for one loose diamond. A ring setting and assembly are separate. How to turn a loose diamond into a ring.
No change-of-mind returns. If the stone doesn’t match its report, arrives damaged or is the wrong stone, you’re covered. See what’s covered.
IGI report #LG786663582
No minimum order. Signature required at delivery.
This in-stock loose stone: allow approximately 2–4 business days after payment clears — ships the same or next business day by insured FedEx 2Day. Delivery details.
All sales are final. Report a wrong or damaged stone within 48 hours of delivery. A stone that doesn’t match its IGI or GIA report is refunded in full, return shipping included.
Read the full policy before ordering.
Questions about this diamond? Ask us.
| Shape | Round |
| Carat | 1.58 |
| Color | F |
| Clarity | VS2 |
| Cut | Ideal |
| Polish | Excellent |
| Symmetry | Excellent |
| Measurements | 7.45 X 7.48 X 4.60 |
| Certification |
Supplier-hosted certificate PDF #LG786663582 ↗
Open IGI's official report-check page ↗ |
| Status | Available |
Cross-shop it: search IGI report #LG786663582 across retailers ↗ — same report number means the same physical stone.
View your comparison · No account needed
Price is shown publicly. Listed stones are ready to add to cart.
Prefer a finished ring?
These are separate, ready-made rings. They do not use the loose diamond on this page. Each comes with its own certified lab-grown diamonds (D–F color, VS–VVS clarity) in 14KT solid gold, made to order in 2–3 weeks.
1.5ct Round Solitaire Ring
$1,199
Complete ring · own diamonds included
View ring →
1.5ct Round Intertwined Solitaire Ring
$1,599
Complete ring · own diamonds included
View ring →
1.5ct Round Twist Solitaire Ring
$1,599
Complete ring · own diamonds included
View ring →
Made-to-order rings are final sale. See all rings · Want this exact stone set instead? Ask a specialist